Merge pull request 'Fix except clause syntax in JWT verification fallback' (#81 ) from feature/fix-except-clause-syntax-in-jwt-verification into develop

Reviewed-on: #81
fix: use separate except clauses for JWT verification fallback
2026-03-22 09:53:43 +01:00 · 2026-03-22 09:52:33 +01:00
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
--- a/backend/src/app/core/auth.py
+++ b/backend/src/app/core/auth.py
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ def _verify_jwt(token: str) -> dict | None:
                algorithms=["RS256"],
                audience="authenticated",
            )
-        except jwt.InvalidTokenError, PyJWKClientError:
+        except jwt.InvalidTokenError:
            pass
        except PyJWKClientError:
            pass
    return _verify_jwt_hs256(token)
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
TheFurya	94cc74c0fb	Merge pull request 'Fix except clause syntax in JWT verification fallback' (#81 ) from feature/fix-except-clause-syntax-in-jwt-verification into develop All checks were successful CI / backend-tests (push) Successful in 30s Details CI / frontend-tests (push) Successful in 28s Details Reviewed-on: #81	2026-03-22 09:53:43 +01:00
Julian Tabel	41a18edb4f	fix: use separate except clauses for JWT verification fallback All checks were successful CI / backend-tests (pull_request) Successful in 29s Details CI / frontend-tests (pull_request) Successful in 29s Details ruff format strips parentheses from `except (A, B):`, turning it into Python 2 comma syntax that only catches the first exception. Use separate except clauses so PyJWKClientError is actually caught. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-03-22 09:52:33 +01:00